Reproducibility of a new method to assess endothelial function by peripheral arterial volume

Preprint | 
10.55415/deep-2024-0002.v1
This is not the most recent version. There is anewer versionof this content available.
Yuanqiao Liu#
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease
Yanan Zhao
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease
Zihan li
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease, Changchun, Jilin
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease, Changchun, Jilin
Ping Yang
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease
Daoyuan Si*
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University++Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease

# contributed equally to this work, * Corresponding author


Abstract

Background: 

The assessment of endothelial function is crucial in understanding the progression of cardiovascular disease. It is important to have reliable and convenient non-invasive methods for evaluating endothelial function. Peripheral arterial volume (PAV) measurement at the fingertip is a novel approach, but there is limited data on its reproducibility. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the reproducibility of PAV measurement in a clinical setting. 


 Method: 

A total of 152 consecutive patients (average age 55.8±12.3, 83 males) with chest pain were included in the study. PAV tests were conducted on separate days. The amplitude ratio before and after applying pressure, along with the reference ratio, were recorded to calculate PAV. Medical baseline data for these patients were gathered from the hospital's records. 


Result: 

On test days, the PAV results were 1.15±0.33 and 1.15±0.31 (p=0.99), indicating no significant difference between the two measurements in all subjects. The mean difference was 0.00±0.32, showing no systematic errors, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.66. Furthermore, age, sex, and BMI did not influence the reproducibility of PAV.


Conclusion: 

PAV measurement is not only feasible but also exhibits excellent reproducibility among all the enrolled patients. As a novel fingertip measurement, PAV holds promise for providing a convenient and accurate assessment of endothelial function in adults.

Keywords
Subject Area
Version History
  • 27 Feb 2024 08:43 Version 1
Scores
 0
Rapid Rating Times: 0
· Level of Quality: -
· Level of Repeatability: -
· Level of Innovation: -
· Level of Impact: -

*Each rating ranges from 0-5

Rapid Rating
Your professional field is different from the direction of this article. Go Settings!
  • Level of Quality
    Is the publication of relevance for the academic community and does it provide important insights? Is the language correct and easy to understand for an academic in the field? Are the figures well displayed and captions properly described? Is the article systematically and logically organized?
    0.0
  • Level of Repeatability
    Is the hypothesis clearly formulated? Is the argumentation stringent? Are the data sound, well-controlled and statistically significant? Is the interpretation balanced and supported by the data? Are appropriate and state-of-the-art methods used?
    0.0
  • Level of Innovation
    Does the work represent a novel approach or new findings in comparison with other publications in the field?
    0.0
  • Level of Impact
    Does the work have potential huge impact to the related research area?
    0.0
Submit

我们使用 cookie 将您与其他用户区分开来, 并在我们的网站上为您提供更好的体验。

关闭此消息以接受 cookie 或了解如何管理您的 cookie 设置。

了解更多关于我们的隐私声明..

goTop