The changes of autonomic nervous function in coronary heart disease patients >60 years old with normotension and hypertension: an observational study

Preprint | 
10.55415/deep-2023-0041.v1
This is not the most recent version. There is anewer versionof this content available.
Jing-Xiu Li#
Department of Electrocardiogram, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China
Department of Electrocardiogram, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China
Wang Jing
Department of Electrocardiogram, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China
Department of Electrocardiogram, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China
Bei-Bei Ding
Department of Electrocardiogram, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China
Department of Electrocardiogram, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China
Gao Min #*
Department of Electrocardiogram, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China
Department of Electrocardiogram, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China

# contributed equally to this work, * Corresponding author


Abstract

AIM The aim of our observational research was to make an in-depth analysis of the autonomic function in normotension and hypertensive patients over 60 years old with coronary artery disease. Method 104 patients over 60 years old with coronary heart disease (CHD) were divided into normotension group and hypertension (HT) group. 24-hour Holter monitoring was carried out to assess the autonomic function. Result Among the 104 patients analyzed, 52 patients had coronary heart disease with normotension, and 52 had coronary heart disease with hypertension. The 24-Holter results of time-domain methods showed that values from time-domain parameters for heart rate variability (HRV) were significantly lower in coronary heart disease patients with hypertension than coronary heart disease group. Furthermore, both during the daytime and during the nighttime, the time-domain parameters were significantly lower in coronary heart disease patients with hypertension than coronary heart disease group. We found there was no difference in autonomic function during the daytime and during the nighttime in their own group. Values from frequency-domain parameters for HRV were also significantly lower in CHD patients with hypertension than CHD group. More patients in the CHD+HT group than in the CHD group received the percutaneous coronary intervention (57.69% vs. 50% c2=0.619, p=0.55). Through the 12 months of follow-up, we found no significant difference in rehospitalization for unstable angina and target lesion revascularization between CHD patients with normotension and CHD patients with hypertension. Conclusion The dysfunction of heart autonomic nervous in CHD patients over 60 years old with hypertension was more serious than CHD patients with normotension, and more clinical attention should be aroused.


Keywords
Subject Area
Version History
  • 19 Jun 2023 08:47 Version 1
Scores
 4.25
Rapid Rating Times: 1
· Level of Quality: 5
· Level of Repeatability: 3
· Level of Innovation: 4
· Level of Impact: 5

*Each rating ranges from 0-5

Rapid Rating
Your professional field is different from the direction of this article. Go Settings!
  • Level of Quality
    Is the publication of relevance for the academic community and does it provide important insights? Is the language correct and easy to understand for an academic in the field? Are the figures well displayed and captions properly described? Is the article systematically and logically organized?
    0.0
  • Level of Repeatability
    Is the hypothesis clearly formulated? Is the argumentation stringent? Are the data sound, well-controlled and statistically significant? Is the interpretation balanced and supported by the data? Are appropriate and state-of-the-art methods used?
    0.0
  • Level of Innovation
    Does the work represent a novel approach or new findings in comparison with other publications in the field?
    0.0
  • Level of Impact
    Does the work have potential huge impact to the related research area?
    0.0
Submit

我们使用 cookie 将您与其他用户区分开来, 并在我们的网站上为您提供更好的体验。

关闭此消息以接受 cookie 或了解如何管理您的 cookie 设置。

了解更多关于我们的隐私声明..

goTop