Cardio-Electrophysiological Balance Index in Cardiovascular Diseases

Preprint | 
10.55415/deep-2022-0028.v1
This is not the most recent version. There is anewer versionof this content available.
Lutfu Askin
Department of cardiology, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
Department of cardiology, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
Okan Tanriverdi
Department of cardiology, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
Department of cardiology, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
Lutfu ASKİN*
Department of cardiology, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
Department of cardiology, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
Okan Tanrıverdi
Department of cardiology, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey
Department of cardiology, Adiyaman Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey

# contributed equally to this work, * Corresponding author


Abstract

More information regarding ventricular arrhythmogenesis is provided by the heart's electrophysiological balance index (iCEB) than other electrocardiography (ECG) indices, such as ventricular repolarization (VR) (QT, corrected QT [QTc], etc.). Malignant ventricular arrhythmia has been linked to iCEB. Drug-induced arrhythmias have been linked to a novel risk marker known as the iCEB (QT interval divided by the QRS duration), which was recently tested in an animal model. The effective refractory time (ERP) multiplied by the conduction velocity was assumed to be the cardiac wavelength iCEB, and an increase or reduction in iCEB might indicate an increased risk of VT/VF caused by TdP or non-TdP. One of the most often used methods for assessing the cardiac waveform is iCEB (QT/QRS). Increases in iCEB are associated with TdP, whereas decreases in iCEB are associated with non-TdP mediated VT/VF. Since it is noninvasive and easily measured, iCEB may serve as an indicator of arrhythmia risk.
Supplementary Material
  1. supplementary_image.jpg
Keywords
Subject Area
Version History
  • 20 May 2022 10:37 Version 1
Scores
 4.5
Rapid Rating Times: 1
· Level of Quality: 3
· Level of Repeatability: 4
· Level of Innovation: 4
· Level of Impact: 4

*Each rating ranges from 0-5

Rapid Rating
Your professional field is different from the direction of this article. Go Settings!
  • Level of Quality
    Is the publication of relevance for the academic community and does it provide important insights? Is the language correct and easy to understand for an academic in the field? Are the figures well displayed and captions properly described? Is the article systematically and logically organized?
    0.0
  • Level of Repeatability
    Is the hypothesis clearly formulated? Is the argumentation stringent? Are the data sound, well-controlled and statistically significant? Is the interpretation balanced and supported by the data? Are appropriate and state-of-the-art methods used?
    0.0
  • Level of Innovation
    Does the work represent a novel approach or new findings in comparison with other publications in the field?
    0.0
  • Level of Impact
    Does the work have potential huge impact to the related research area?
    0.0
Submit

我们使用 cookie 将您与其他用户区分开来, 并在我们的网站上为您提供更好的体验。

关闭此消息以接受 cookie 或了解如何管理您的 cookie 设置。

了解更多关于我们的隐私声明..

goTop