Changes in the urine proteome after massage in healthy people

Preprint | 
10.55415/deep-2023-0013.v2
This is not the most recent version. There is anewer versionof this content available.
Bao Yijin
Gene Engineering Drug and Biotechnology Beijing Key Laboratory, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100871, China
Gene Engineering Drug and Biotechnology Beijing Key Laboratory, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100871, China
Gao Youhe*
Gene Engineering Drug and Biotechnology Beijing Key Laboratory, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100871, China
Gene Engineering Drug and Biotechnology Beijing Key Laboratory, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100871, China

# contributed equally to this work, * Corresponding author


Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effect of massage on the urine proteome of healthy people. In this study, participants underwent 1-hour whole body massage. Urine samples were collected at 0, 2, and 24h after the massage and urine proteins were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Compared with the control (before massage), 41 differential proteins were identified in the group 2h after the massage, the random mean number of differentially produced proteins was 11 with 73% confidence, and the biological process of protein enrichment was catecholamine biosynthesis, which was related to the promotion of metabolism and the regulation of neural activities. While 29 differential proteins were identified in the group 24h after the massage, the random average number of differential proteins produced was 10, with the confidence of the difference decreased to 65%, and the effective biological process could not be enriched at this time. The results suggested that the difference in urine protein was greater at 2h after the massage and gradually decreased at 24h after the massage. The proteome of urine may reflect changes in the body following minor massage stimuli, providing a potential way to evaluate the effects of massage therapy.

Keywords
Subject Area
Version History
Scores
 3.75
Rapid Rating Times: 1
· Level of Quality: 4
· Level of Repeatability: 4
· Level of Innovation: 4
· Level of Impact: 3

*Each rating ranges from 0-5

Rapid Rating
Your professional field is different from the direction of this article. Go Settings!
  • Level of Quality
    Is the publication of relevance for the academic community and does it provide important insights? Is the language correct and easy to understand for an academic in the field? Are the figures well displayed and captions properly described? Is the article systematically and logically organized?
    0.0
  • Level of Repeatability
    Is the hypothesis clearly formulated? Is the argumentation stringent? Are the data sound, well-controlled and statistically significant? Is the interpretation balanced and supported by the data? Are appropriate and state-of-the-art methods used?
    0.0
  • Level of Innovation
    Does the work represent a novel approach or new findings in comparison with other publications in the field?
    0.0
  • Level of Impact
    Does the work have potential huge impact to the related research area?
    0.0
Submit

我们使用 cookie 将您与其他用户区分开来, 并在我们的网站上为您提供更好的体验。

关闭此消息以接受 cookie 或了解如何管理您的 cookie 设置。

了解更多关于我们的隐私声明..

goTop